In
“The Cultural Logic of Media Convergence,” Henry Jenkin’s provides a clear
outline of how media forms—both current and emerging—interpenetrate each other
in its production and consumption. For Jenkins, media convergence is a dynamic
process that problematizes our methods for studying media (whether they be an
industry approach or an audience/effects studies approach). As he states, “Convergence
is both a top-down corporate-driven process and a bottom-up consumer-driven
process. Media companies are learning how to accelerate the flow of media
content across delivery channels to expand revenue opportunities, broaden
markets and reinforce viewer commitments” (37). His 7th point in his
“list” is particularly interesting to me because I think he offers two
different models for negotiating the relationship between consumers and
producers. The recording industry demonstrates the example of the “tight
leash,” historically locking down the peer-to-peer sharing by music fans. The
other model Jenkins posits is the gaming industry that has actively built up
(instead of “shutting down”) active fan communities (40). Both industries since
Jenkins’ article have shifted drastically. For instance, the recording industry
moved largely to subscription-based models such as Spotify or Pandora, where
corporations could control the casual, “promiscuous” relationship most
listeners could have toward the wide array of music (the impulse behind sites
like Limewire). TV has also adopted a more “casual” relationship toward its
content—most evident from Netflix and Hulu. When Game of Thrones became the most pirated show on the web, HBO
released HBOgo to profit off of those who had abandoned cable packages
altogether but were in desperate need to watch each week’s new episode. Its
stand-a-lone subscription model appears to cater to viewers, allowing for
viewers to be fans of the show (even those who don’t even subscribe to a TV
cable package).
It
seems like HBO has also begun to experiment with investing in shows with a
large online fan-base. I am thinking of Issa Rae’s Insecure, which grew from her web show “Awkward Black Girl.” And,
in many ways, this “organic” cultivation of a fan-base became something that
was successful and profitable on HBO. Although the characters and the
storylines for Insecure differ
greatly from the online series, the overall aesthetic and “feel” of the show
borrows from the tropes that made the online series success (the “vlogg-y”
internal narration, the “secret life” persona of Issa as an amateur rapper, and
so forth). I think Insecure is an
instance in which TV attempts to be like the “Internet,” replicating but re-polishing
the feel of online/YouTube content.
Further,
it’s been great to see Issa Rae attempt to carve out a similar path for other
writers/producers of color who might be able to find a way into the TV industry
in the openings made possible by media convergence. She founded ColorCreative
TV to find and nurture emerging writers of color to create a digital series
anthology. I am interested in whether or not this turn by larger networks such
as HBO will actually be a successful entry point for more “diverse” perspectives
in TV content.
Thanks for your comment. I wasn't aware of this show (Insecure) but it does remind me of earlier points of this type of convergence. The first time I became aware of it was when the character "Fred" from YouTube, as well, guest starred on Nickelodeon's iCarly and later had his own tv show created on Nickelodeon a little while later. I remember thinking that the convergence didn't work, that it actually "killed" the Fred character for dedicated YouTube fans. I find the same thing happening with Miranda Sings' new original series on Netflix. There's just something about the crappy quality that creates a line between quality television and homemade content that doesn't feel natural to cross. From your comment it sounds like Insecure is a much more successful case which makes me think it really just depends on which company takes it on.
ReplyDeleteI think that's a really interesting point you make around TV attempting to be like the Internet. Beyond Insecure (which I'm generally a fan of), HBO also has Vimeo-originating High Maintenance, which I would argue is even more "Internet"-y in that there aren't continuing storylines across episodes. Rather, each one functions like a webisode vignette, following a new person each week (although The Guy plays some role in each story). To your point, I think it's interesting that HBO retained the general webisode format of both of these series, rather than trying to mold them into more stereotypical half-hour comedies.
ReplyDelete